Blog

Opinion. On paper, this was XRP’s best week of the fall. Paxos, the regulated back end behind crypto at some of the biggest apps in finance, switched on XRP for its partners. A top Korean brokerage, Meritz Securities, signed up to study Ripple’s custody tech. Evernorth’s XRP treasury company still expects to start trading on Nasdaq on Monday. And the price? XRP was near $1.40 on Thursday, down nearly 7% on the week, FXStreet reported.

Good news, falling price. Somebody is getting played. So follow the whales.

Where the big coins went

Large holders have been pulling XRP off the biggest exchange. The 30-day sum of whale outflows from Binance hit 1.38 billion XRP, the highest in seven months, according to CryptoQuant data cited by CoinGape.

Santiment’s wallet data points the same way. Wallets holding 10 million to 100 million XRP added about 1.61 billion tokens in the two weeks after September 20, reaching a record 13.93 billion XRP as of October 3, The Crypto Basic reported.

Fair warning: coins leaving an exchange are not proof of buying. Big wallets can belong to custodians, funds or Ripple itself, and exchange flows run in both directions. But coins moved to storage are not sitting on an order book waiting to be sold, either.

Who paid for the dip

Now look at who got hurt. Over the past 24 hours XRP saw $14.69 million in liquidations, and $14.24 million of it, about 97%, was long positions, according to CoinGlass data reported by The Crypto Times. That is the leveraged crowd that bought the headlines.

The fund crowd sat on its hands. U.S. spot XRP ETFs recorded exactly zero net flow on Wednesday, while bitcoin ETFs lost $487 million and ether ETFs $161 million, per SoSoValue data compiled by CoinGabbar. And Washington did not help. Fed minutes released Wednesday showed most officials expect another hike by year-end, with Treasury yields near their highest since 2002, CNBC reported. When cash pays again, leverage pays the bill.

My read, labeled as a guess

Here is the speculation, and it is only that: the whales are positioning for the day a household-name app actually turns on the Paxos pipe. They would rather fill their bags from margin calls this week than compete with brokerage customers later. Wall Street gets the plumbing first. Main Street gets the liquidation notice.

To be clear, that is not a knock on Paxos. Building regulated rails, and saying so in public, is exactly what this market needs more of. The question is who gets to use those rails first, and at what price. Watch two things: which partner flips XRP on for its customers, and whether whale balances keep climbing if $1.40 breaks.

Sources: Paxos on X; FXStreet; CoinGape; The Crypto Basic; The Crypto Times; CoinGabbar; CNBC

Opinion. Yesterday this desk asked who picks up the ether bid when BitMine hits its target. On Wednesday, BitMine chairman Tom Lee answered half the question. Speaking at Token2049 in Singapore, he said the company will stop at 5% of ether’s supply. “That’s a hard cap. We’re not gonna be accumulating past 5%,” Lee said, according to Cointelegraph. “We’re not gonna own more than 5% of Ethereum.”

That is a real change. Lee had left the door open to going past 5%, and as recently as an August interview with Bankless he said the company might revisit it in 2027, Cointelegraph noted. Now the target is a ceiling. Credit where due: BitMine announced its goal in public, reported its pile every week and is now telling the market exactly where it stops. Most whales never tell you anything.

Do the math. BitMine’s October 5 update put its stack at 6,016,414 ETH, about 4.9% of a 122.1 million supply. Five percent is about 6.1 million. That leaves roughly 89,000 ETH by Hardwire’s count, or “about 100,000” in Lee’s round number. At Wednesday’s price near $2,616, that is somewhere around $230 million to $260 million of buying left. Then the biggest corporate bid in ether stops.

Who else is selling

Look at who was on the other side this week. U.S. spot ether ETFs lost $202 million on Tuesday, after about $51 million on Monday, and have now bled roughly $408 million over six straight sessions, Cointelegraph reported, citing SoSoValue. Bitcoin ETFs took in $119 million the same day. Money didn’t leave crypto. It left ether.

The old money is cashing in too. On Monday, Lookonchain flagged a long-dormant early ether wallet sending 13,330 ETH, about $36.4 million, to Coinbase after six months of silence. Then came Wednesday morning’s flush. Ether fell below $2,600 at one point, The Crypto Times reported, with about $175 million in ETH liquidations. Across the market, more than $400 million in longs were wiped out in an hour, Bitcoin.com News reported, the same morning Lee told the room crypto is “2 days past the bottom.”

Even Washington moved coins. Wallets linked to the U.S. government sent 833.6 BTC, about $71.6 million, toward Coinbase Prime deposit addresses on Tuesday, CoinDesk reported, citing Arkham. A transfer is not a sale, and no sale has been confirmed. But taxpayers are still learning what their own government does with seized bitcoin from a private blockchain-tracking firm, not from Washington. That should bother people on both sides of the aisle.

The staking question

Here’s the part the headline skips. BitMine’s update listed 5,067,309 ETH staked, and staking pays rewards in more ETH. Lee has said BitMine could sell staking-earned ETH to keep its share from rising above 5%, Cointelegraph reported. Speculation, labeled: if that’s the plan, the biggest ether buyer of the cycle could turn into a small, steady seller once it hits the cap. That’s not a scandal. It’s arithmetic. But it is the opposite of the “every week” headline that helped carry ether this year.

Lee frames the cap as bullish. “We’re done stacking in front of a 25X move,” he said, and without new ETH buying BitMine doesn’t need to keep raising capital. That is a fair argument for BMNR shareholders. It is a different question for everyone holding ETH itself. Speculation, labeled: the whale just told you it’s leaving the buy side. Wall Street’s ETF money is already heading for the exit. Somebody has to replace both, and so far nobody has raised a hand.

Hardwire’s read: thank BitMine for the clarity, then plan around it. Watch three things. Do the ETH ETF outflows stop? Does a new treasury buyer step up? And does BitMine’s first post-cap update show it selling staking rewards?

Sources: Cointelegraph (BitMine hard cap); BitMine release (Oct 5); Cointelegraph (ETF flows); Lookonchain; The Crypto Times; Bitcoin.com News; CoinDesk

Opinion. BitMine Immersion Technologies said Monday it added 15,112 ETH last week, about $41 million at its $2,726 reference price. It now holds 6,016,414 ETH. That’s 4.9% of the 122.1 million supply, and the company says it’s 99% of the way to the “Alchemy of 5%” goal it set 15 months ago. The release leads with the streak: BitMine has bought ether every single week since June 30, 2025.

The streak is real. So is the slowdown. Two weeks ago the weekly buy was 27,562 ETH. Last week it fell to 17,362, the smallest since mid-August, according to Unchained. This week it’s 15,112. Back in the spring, BitMine was buying more than 100,000 ETH in a week. To be fair to Tom Lee, he told Consensus in May that the pace would ease as the company closed in on 5%. Nobody hid the ball. But “we bought again” and “we’re still the bid” aren’t the same headline, and only one of them is getting printed.

Do the math the press release doesn’t. Five percent of 122.1 million ETH is about 6.1 million. BitMine needs roughly 89,000 more, and at last week’s pace that’s about six weeks of buying. Then what? Either the biggest corporate ether buyer sets a new target, or one of the steadiest bids in this market shrinks to a maintenance trickle.

Some other numbers in the release are worth a look. Cash and marketable securities fell to $643 million from $672 million a week earlier. The staked figure, 5,067,309 ETH, matches the count in every weekly update since at least mid-August, Unchained noted. So recent buys aren’t showing up as newly staked coins. Lee also highlighted the largest-ever crypto treasury equity buyback, 21 million shares this year. Speculation, labeled: a company that spends on its own stock while its ETH buys shrink may be choosing between propping up the share price and adding to its pile. That’s a legitimate capital choice, not a scandal. It just isn’t the story the streak tells.

Strategy shows the same pattern with bitcoin. Its Monday 8-K reported 334 BTC for $28.7 million, down from 1,665 BTC the week before. That takes its stack to 848,000 BTC. In the same week, Michael Saylor said Strategy repurchased $176 million of its STRC preferred shares, about six times what it put into bitcoin. The orange chart still goes up and to the right. But more of the money is now going into managing the company’s own securities rather than buying bitcoin.

Speculation, labeled: this looks less like whales losing faith and more like whales switching modes. One is finishing a target. The other is protecting the instruments that funded its buying. Either way, the steady corporate bid that helped carry this cycle is getting smaller, while the marketing keeps sounding the same. Lee keynotes Token2049 on Wednesday, and his October Chairman’s Message is titled “Crypto bull underway.” Maybe so. But a bull market needs a buyer at the margin, and the two loudest ones are buying less.

Hardwire’s read: credit BitMine and Strategy for doing exactly what they said they’d do, in public, every week. Then watch the size, not the streak. If the next marginal buyer isn’t a treasury company, it has to be ETF flows, sovereigns or retail. Find out which before you trust the next “every week” headline.

Sources: BitMine release (Oct 5); Decrypt; BitMine release (Sep 28); Unchained; The Block; Strategy 8-K

Opinion. On October 2, the Independent Community Bankers of America sued the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in federal court in Washington. The suit asks a judge to throw out the OCC’s March 2 chartering rule and Interpretive Letter 1176, to cancel Protego’s conditional trust-bank approval, and to block the agency from using either document to approve any more charters. ICBA says the OCC has approved or conditionally approved 21 national trust banks under this administration, and that at least 13 of them are crypto companies.

Read the press release and you get consumer protection and systemic risk. Read the complaint and you get something more honest. Paragraph after paragraph is about competition. Two anonymous member banks, each with less than $2.5 billion in assets, say they spend more than $1.5 million a year on compliance that crypto trust banks skip, and that they’ve already lost “hundreds of thousands of dollars” in business this year to firms with conditional OCC approval. That’s a real grievance. It’s also the oldest story in banking: whoever holds the license wants the next applicant held to a higher bar, or kept out.

Give the bankers their due, because some of their points are strong. A national trust bank doesn’t carry FDIC insurance. It isn’t supervised like a bank holding company. And it can preempt a lot of state consumer law. The complaint also notes that the OCC hasn’t run an uninsured bank receivership in nearly a hundred years. If one of these new charters fails in a crypto crash, nobody has recently tested what happens next. Customers who see “national bank” on the door may assume protections that aren’t there. Those are fair questions, and the OCC’s two-page response to comments, as ICBA describes it, didn’t answer many of them.

Here’s what they aren’t putting in the headline. The legal weapon is the major questions doctrine, the same conservative tool used to rein in agencies that claim sweeping powers Congress never granted. This time it’s pointed at a Trump-era OCC, and at an interpretive letter written by Jonathan Gould before he became Comptroller. ICBA also leans on the GENIUS Act, arguing that because Congress has now legislated on stablecoins, it meant to keep the bigger crypto-banking question for itself. Speculation, labeled: that line of argument would let incumbents treat every unfinished bill as a reason to freeze agency action in the meantime.

Keep the scope straight, too. Ripple, Circle, and the other December 2025 conditional approvals aren’t named as targets for vacatur. Protego is the only charter the suit asks the court to cancel outright. Filing a complaint revokes nothing, and the OCC has declined to comment on the litigation. But the relief ICBA wants, an order stopping the OCC from using the rule or IL 1176 to approve future charters, would close the path for whoever comes next, however clean their books are.

Hardwire’s read: be skeptical of the regulator that redefined a 1978 sentence into a national on-ramp, and be skeptical of the trade group that wants a judge to slam that ramp shut at the exact moment its members started losing customers. If crypto firms want bank-grade credibility, they should accept bank-grade scrutiny. If community banks want to keep their customers, they’ll need a better product, not just a better lawyer.

Sources: ICBA complaint; ICBA release; CoinDesk; American Banker; OCC

Follow the wallets, not the talking heads. This weekend the bitcoin tape ran up to just shy of $86,950, came within about $500 of its late-September high near $87,400, and then slipped back under $86,000. Second stall in a week. While the chart crowd argued about the line, the real whales filed their receipts Monday morning. The receipts say something interesting.

Start with the biggest corporate whale in the water. Strategy’s 8-K says it bought 334 BTC from Oct. 1 through Oct. 4, for $28.7 million, at an average of about $85,839. That takes it to 848,000 BTC. Same filing: Strategy spent $73.7 million over those same days buying back its STRC preferred stock, and $176.3 million on STRC buybacks counting Sept. 28 to 30. The buying streak is alive. The cash just went to two places, coin and capital stack, and the coin got the smaller slice this week.

Now the smaller whale. Strive CEO Matt Cole posted that Strive bought 2,000 BTC for $169 million, at an average cost of $84,422, taking it to 29,462 BTC. He said 61.5% of the money came from SATA, its preferred stock, and warrants brought in $56.7 million. Read that again: a company holding about 3.5% as much bitcoin as Strategy bought roughly six times as many coins this week. The little fish is swimming hard, and it is doing it in the open with a filing behind it.

Then the ghosts. On-chain tracker Lookonchain flagged two early holders who bought 1,346 BTC about 13 years ago, at an average near $178, and just moved a tiny test amount, 0.0005 BTC, worth about $43. Their stack is worth about $115 million now. Labeled speculation: a $43 test is what you send when you want to be sure the keys still work before you move real size. It could also be an estate, a lawyer or simple curiosity. A test is not a sale. But when 13-year-old coins clear their throat near a multi-month high, the smart move is to watch, not to guess.

Over in XRP, the big wallets are doing nothing at all, and that is the tell. Analyst Ali Martinez wrote Sunday that XRP whales have “remained relatively sidelined over the past week, with no significant change” in holdings, while the price coils near $1.50. The calendar is loaded: Evernorth says it expects to close its Armada deal on Oct. 7, with XRPN trading on Nasdaq on Oct. 8, subject to remaining closing conditions. Labeled speculation: big holders sitting flat into a dated event usually means they want to see the first prints before they commit. Quiet hands are not empty hands.

The populist read here is simple. The man on the street is told the Fed, the jobs report and the chart pattern decide everything. Meanwhile, the people with real size are telling you exactly what they did, in 8-Ks and signed posts, every Monday. Weekend liquidations, per CoinDesk, were light at $62.7 million, and shorts made up 68% of them. That is not a crowd in panic. That is a crowd leaning the wrong way and paying a small bill for it.

My positioning question for the week is not “will bitcoin break $87,000.” It is: who is buying at $84,000 to $86,000, with what money, and who is just testing their keys? This week the answer came with names and numbers attached. Watch the filings. They do not tweet in all caps.

Sources: Strategy 8-K; Matt Cole on X; Bloomingbit; Lookonchain; Tron Weekly; PR Newswire; CoinDesk; CoinDesk